In the latest issue of CIO, Michael Friedenberg wrote an article (entitled "The Cost of Data Management") which discusses the challenges facing organizations given the explosion in information.
Friedenberg cites a well recited factoid that, while the cost of storage continues to fall, the cost of managing that information keeps rising.
But what does it mean to manage information? As I indicated in a prior blog post (entitled "Avoiding the Information Management Train Wreck"), in order to effectively manage information, companies must:
Friedenberg identifies the key factors impacting the growth of information within the enterprise. These include:
To respond to these challenges, the "Who's Who" of computing (including IBM, EMC, Symantec, CA, Microsoft, Oracle, HP, Google and others) provide a set of solutions to help companies better find, protect, share, store, purge, backup and archive their information.
Unfortunately, these solutions are largely cobbled together (typically from acquisitions) and do not scale to manage all information holistically. So, a company either needs to purchase and deploy multiple solutions (which is quite expensive) or accept the risk that some of its information will not be completely managed (which can also be quite expensive).
What's next for Information Management? As Friedenberg concludes, while managing information is "no easy task", it is clearly becoming a higher priority in corporate America. Because of this, I expect further consolidation in the industry as the major players increase their focus on holistic information management solutions.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Labels: Information Management
Post a Comment